Sunday, March 16, 2014

Draft 2

           During the 19th century, the Western Expansion preoccupied the minds' of most Americans. After the acquisition of the Louisiana territory, American nationalism was at its peak as all of America scrambled throughout to turn the belief in Manifest Destiny into a dream come true. This directly resulted in the Transcontinental Railroad, which became the perfect solution to join the West coast and the East coast. During one of the greatest movements in history, Robert Grainier, a character in Denis Johnson's novella, lives on the Western frontier while experiencing this historical movement in terms of De Certeau's Spatial Stories.
            Michel De Certeau's Spatial Stories reinforce the definitions of words we may use every day, but may not understand the true meaning behind. There's a fine line between certain words that calls for the need to specifically differentiate one from the other. A clear example would be the words "space" and place" or "map" and "tour." Although both sets of words have similar context, both are of different origin and define completely different subjects.
            Michel De Certeau's Spatial Stories act as a guiding vessel in the employment of the overarching concepts of the spatial stories explored in Train Dreams. These concepts include the difference between space and place, as well as an understanding of how thresholds are defined in Train Dreams. And in between these space, place, and threshold, what are frontiers. Through these analyses, we can better understand the text and the message Johnson is trying to articulate.

De Certeau defines space as an area where the existence is created by the activity that defines it so. The definition of place is the establishment of space. Therein place only exist after space is created and recreated over again with the same purpose in mind. This can be seen in Train Dreams throughout the novella in both literal terms and conceptual terms.
Such that Grainier’s home would represent something that is a “place,” while “space” would be that of the entire town of Moyea Valley. In that the daily activities of the townspeople would create what a “town” is. Space can contain places, but in theory, it space is the creation of place. An example would be how Grainier can live in Moyea Valley, but the Valley itself can change due to external causes. Although the valley can change, the location in which Grainier chooses to live will still be his home. An example in the novella would be when Grainier’s cabin burned down, even though his cabin is gone, the concept of home is not. As long as Grainier rebuilds this cabin on the same plot of land and resumes doing “home” activities, it will still remain as a definition of home. This applies to space, too. Grainier had participated in various locations throughout the novella to aid the development of the railroads. Each location he had worked on would be considered as one of De Certeau’s space. This is due to the fact that each space is occupied for different reasons. His occupation as a logger, for example, led him to occupy a forest. In that moment the forest is still a forest, but once it is cleared, it becomes another space. Because they are occupied only for the moment, they are interchangeable. Thereby abiding De Certeau’s law of space.
With this concept, home can be seen as something stagnant and unchangeable, whilst a town is fickle and ever changing. Just as there is a definition for “space” and “place” in literal terms, there is also a conceptual distinction in “space” and “place.” Grainier’s character lacks mental development throughout the entire novella, thereby characterizing his internal mind as a “place.” Compared to most of the other characters throughout the series of short stories, Grainier does not cognitively “grow up.” This can be seen in the dialogue between his wife, Gladys, and him in the beginning of the story. In which, he asks her how much does his four month old daughter know. Through this dialogue, one can assume Grainier’s mind is one of a simpleton. Not only that, but he does not strive for change. In the scene where Elvis Presley, the King of Rock, passes by on a train and waves, Grainier metaphorically misses his appearance. This indicates Grainier’s inability in keeping up with the ever-changing world, as he obsesses over his wife and child’s death. Abstractly, this would also characterize the other characters in town as a “space.” In that each character changes. Dealing with similar woes as Grainier, the colorful characters that Grainier meets appear to be more dynamic. In that each character has their life changing moment, yet each has the ability to move on. William Coswell Haley molested his niece when she was 12 and left town shortly after he discovered that his brother beat her to death. Although a heinous crime, Haley was able to move on and physically live his life, albeit with underlying guilt. This goes for the widow Claire Thompson, whose husband had passed away in the previous summer. Although a short marriage, it was a marriage nevertheless; she had picked up everything to leave Montana for Idaho. Similarly so, Eddie Sauer, an audaciously brazen character with a playboy past, ironically pursues Claire Thompson and asks for her hand in marriage. Each character lives to move on, yet Grainier is stuck in the moment with the ghosts of his past. Thus Train Dreams, prove De Certeau’s concept of space and place, where each is distinctly different in its own rights, although the connotations of both are very similar. Johnson’s text reinforces these concepts in a literal sense, as well as a conceptual sense.

If there exist a difference in space and place, then there is also a difference in frontier. In which frontier is usually confused as a simple border separating two different geographical regions of space.
            Through short stories, Johnson confirms De Certeau’s explanation that a true frontier is not just a border that separates, but also a bridge between two unique spaces. Thus one space can and only will exist when both frontiers and bridges exist. This can be proven throughout Train Dreams in the series of events in Grainier’s life.
            In a literal sense, the definition of what is human only exists because there is also a definition of what is not. In reference to Train Dreams, there exists normal people like Robert Grainier or Kootenai Bob and the rest of the townspeople and there exists animals, like the wolves and the wolf-girl. Through this intangible frontier, there is a bridge. Because of the separation, there is also a link in between the gap. Without humans, animals would not be considered animals. Without animals, there would not be humans. Therein it is necessary for a bridging between both characterizations for the formation of a frontier. Another example would be the existence of the individual. There can only be a “self” if the opposite of “self” (everyone else) exists. Grainier becomes a unique character, not because of his past sufferings, but because of his unique mentality. In an abstract sense, Grainier has his own “self” and becomes this individual because no one else has the same outlook as him. An example would be Claire Thompson. Both she and Grainier were widowed within a few years of marriage. Although both experienced similar tragedies, both deal with their situation uniquely. In which Grainier wallows in his past and Thompson moves on towards the future. Each character deals with similar experiences in their own unique way. The bridge between these two characters would be the death of their significant other. The frontier that exists would be their mentality in dealing with the actual situation.
            Even in the internal battles within the self, Johnson clearly outlines that there is the existence of a frontier, as well as a bridging between the gaps of the two differences. Grainier battles with the differences of reality and fantasy repeatedly, throughout the mini novel. In which, he has recurring encounters with the ghosts of his past. In the near real life encounter with the ghost of his wife, he reinvents her last moments in the cabin long after she dies, yet he is able to picture the entirety of the event in a realistic manner. In Grainier’s fantasy, he cannot separate the difference between reality and fantasy. This illustrates the underlying message that Johnson tries to recreate, in that there is a fine line that frontiers creates. This frontier divides, but presents the opportunity for a bridge to form between two different concepts with similar ideas. Similarly so, Grainier also stumbles across another man who may knowingly or unknowingly battle with reality and fantasy. Mr. Peterson had reassured Grainier that his gunshot wound was the result of his dog shooting him in self-defense. In reality, the occurrence of such event is not very likely. Even Grainier who can be a bit of a simpleton, questioned Peterson’s story. The question of what is real and fake can only exist because of the “frontier” that exist. This frontier can only exist when the bridge that defines what is related also exists. In this situation the relationship between truth and lies establish this bridge. Truth is related to lies in that they both are the counter definitions of each other. Therefore, reality is directly proportional to truth, just as lies are to fantasy.

In terms of frontiers, bridges, spaces and places, the subject matter of threshold comes into question. Thresholds can be defined in many different ways. The definition that usually comes to mind is any place or point of entering or beginning.
In De Certeau’s definition, a true threshold is any occupiable transitional space. In Train Dreams, this definition is broad and can be defined in a physical sense, as well as in a conceptual and mental fashion.
In the physical sense, tangible thresholds would be the land reserved for the Western Expansion. Because of the concept of Manifest Destiny, each space was kept in mind as a space for transition. In that a place that was once a forest may be cleared to form a space, in which the loggers will occupy. After all the trees are chopped down, the space can perhaps become a place for railroads to pass through. Because of this establishment, it can also lead to the development of a town due to the settlers that may build their homes in the surrounding area. The possibilities are endless. The infinite potential illustrates how malleable this space is. Therein creating the idea of a threshold, since the space is so flexible, it is always in transition.
In a conceptual threshold, there exists a temporal threshold that is affected by the mentality of one person. In which, the transitioning space is the progression of the novel through miniature stories. Although each story exists in its own realms, there is a transition in time to each story. These gaps are the thresholds that lead Grainier to each person. These are the Spatial Stories that De Certeau speaks about. Each story occupies a space in Grainier’s mind. The transition between these stories becomes the threshold of time, but they exist uniquely to each person. In that each occurrence of an event would apply to each person differently. The mentality of each person would affect the temporal threshold that is created from one event to another. This transitional realm is abstract in the sense that it can be affected by the mind in the moment, just as well as it can be affected in the past and the future. A temporal threshold caters to the person’s thoughts. An example of the existence of the temporal threshold would be Granier’s perception of the wolf-girl. Peterson had somewhat convinced Grainier that the wolf-girl was equivalent to that of a demon in the beginning of the novel. Towards the end of the novel, he encounters this wolf-girl. Upon the first-hand confrontation, he recognizes her to be his daughter, Kate. He had believed that she had escaped from the wild fire that had caused Gladys’s death. He immediately comes to her rescue. He brings his daughter into his cabin and fixes a splint on her leg using his own clothes and a stick. The cognition of Granier proves that there exists a temporal threshold and a mental threshold that cross-fade. The existence of this threshold allows for his perceptions to change from being afraid of something unknown, to immediate affection for the very same thing he was once afraid of. This threshold can change depending on Grainier’s future experiences in this matter. If he happens to gain more information on the wolf-girl or new information in general, he could possibly change his perception due to the accumulation of new ideas. Thereby creating a temporal threshold because it is always in transition as well as a mental threshold in that the mentality of one person is affected by the sequential events in life.

Through each story a little more of the Valley of Moyea is uncovered. We begin to see the Spatial Stories that De Certeau speaks about through Train Dreams. In which, we are then able to understand the distinct definitions to the words with similar context, such as the words, space and place. Not only the similarities of words are explored, but also words that represent opposites like frontier and bridges are brought into the light. The creation of such distinct spaces, places, frontiers, and bridges, allow for the existence of thresholds. Using Train Dreams and the stories told within the novella, we were able to differentiate and categorize each story to assemble a distinct definition with clarity.


Sunday, March 2, 2014

TRAIN DREAMS & DECERTEAU SPATIAL STORIES - OUTLINE

- TOPIC: SPACE, PLACE, THRESHOLDS/TRANSITIONS, PATHWAY

               - DE CERTEAU and the definition of what space and place is: space is defined the bodies inside
Frontiers here act as the transitional space where it eventually stabilizes and turns into an official place. A place is something that is stable. The people there act specifically and according to.

                              - EXPANSION TO THE WEST
                              -DIFFERENT PLACES. HOMES. SCENES.PEOPLE HE MEETS/THEIR BACKGROUNDS.
-HOW SPACE ALWAYS CHANGES. A STANDING THRESHOLD. DEPENDING HOW PEOPLE USE THIS AREA?
WHAT IS A TRUE THRESHOLD? WHAT ARE THE THRESHOLDS IN TRAIN DREAMS? HOW ARE THE PEOPLE IN GRANIER'S TRAVELS INVOLVED WITH THRESHOLDS?
 WHAT IS SPACE? WHAT IS PLACE? HOW IS EACH AREA DEFINED AS PLACE/SPACE?
-DOES A CHANGING SPACE CATEGORIZE AS A THRESHOLD?
                              - Minor Questions - How did they build the western expansion? How/Why did                                    they choose the pathway? How do pathways cross?
                              - How were the people affected? How did they change the space they                                               occupied?
                              - WEST meets EAST. transitional/Moving systems are the thresholds.
                              - Moving systems act consciously creates a place
-Train Dreams. Spatial Stories. How the West expanded. How things change. The historical lost of each space.
               -HOW DOES SPACE MAKE PEOPLE BEHAVE? - Forced to interact and cooperate to create this                railroad.
               - How does the hardship during the western expansion affect the personal life of Robert Granier and how does this draw connections to space and place?
               - PATHWAYS/THRESHOLDS. AREAS THAT ARE CLEARED EX FOREST. (For the purpose of building a             path to connect to the ends together)
- Manifest Destiny -
"That westward expansion was greatly aided by the completion of the Transcontinental Railroad in 1869, and passage of the Homestead Act in 1862. That act provided free 160-acre lots in the unsettled West to anyone who would file a claim, live on the land for five years and make improvements to it, including building a dwelling."
-THE CULTURAL ASPECTS - Racism. DID IT AFFECT THE SPACE/PLACE
-Juxtaposition to show analysis. (Small stories) The man and the dog. Granier and land. Etc.
-Story progression
               -The American Dream and Western Expansion
               -His own dreams. The spaces created.

-Other specific moments...

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Andreas Zittel & Train Dreams

Andrea Zittel & Focault

          In the sense that Andrea Zittel's work has its constraints, yet frees itself in the very same gesture, "A-Z Six Month Personal Uniform," Focault had mentioned in, "Docile Bodies," that to form a productive society, one has to conform to the society's constraints. This allows for the creation of masses. In such concoction, there is always one that breaks free of society's constraints and becomes the "outsider." In Zittel's creations, she distinctly clashes against the everyday norms of what the general society would expect. This is shown through"A-Z Six Month Personal Uniform," as well as her other works. There is a recurring theme in that each work takes the "what it seems" and turns it into something different, yet somewhat from the same origins. Another example of such work would be in, "A-Z Carpet Furniture: Cabin." In this "Cabin," Zittel uses the forms of furniture prints and places it on top of carpets. The different colors would represent a different object. Just as a normal house would have different objects like a couch, a bed, the dresser, a rug, etc. Zittel invents this method to represent objects even though they do not exist in that space. The creation of this piece further supports the  idea that of the individual created from the masses. Although objects in rooms are using dictated by the actual volume of space that they take up, ZIttel does not conform to this idea. Her process in this piece reminds one that not all that exist has to exist within the boundary of another. By creating forms that hint at the existence instead of actually depicting the existence, she shows us the potential space the objects would have taken up versus how free a space is with constraints, but without.
          Things like this draw the question in whether constraints are actually created from the mind. That society may not be the culprit to the actual creation of the masses, but the mind. We each follow the discourse of society because we are born into it. As we grow up, our actions are set "autonomous" and we automatically follow these rules. One space is navigated by the actual program because what is there is there. These rules are set and because space itself is not interchangeable, we do not have the ability to do otherwise. In Zittel's work we learn about this otherwise. That although space is set, one does not need to follow these constraints. We have the ability to navigate however we want. Drawing back to "A-Z Six Month Personal Uniform," Zittel uses this same concept to create a non conforming uniform. Creating her own set of rules, she became an individual. Although, we all follow certain constraints in society, we all have an ability to change certain things. I find Zittel interesting in that there is ironic humor in her work. Although each piece abides by societal rules, it also has its own rebellious nature. They conform in a non conforming way. Individuals are created from the mass and this is exemplified by Zittel as a person and through her work.

Train Dreams
Dennis Johnson's train dream has a relationship to space in that the character Robert has different experiences with each place he visits in the course of his journey. In which, some, have a dream like quality to it. The difference between spatial dreams and spatial reality. Overall the story deals with a lot of the reality living in the early 20th century. Even in the beginning of the novella where Granier is seen dangling a Chinese man off of a bridge, after his guilty conscience sets in, he begins to imagine this man everywhere. It sets the "feel" of the novella throughout the rest of the story. As we follow Granier's journey, we sit in his mind and see all that he sees. Even the dreams that he has of his wife and child. In these surreal dreams, there's an interesting dynamic in how space is explored. An example would be the dream in which his wife is padding into the depths of the water with a box of chocolate, a bible, and their child. She runs into the river as the fire devours their home. As she runs away from the fire, she ties the child to her hip and throws away the bible. Seemingly so, throwing away the bible resulted in her death as she fell into rocks, resulting in a broken back.  This surreal scene draws a distinction in between reality and dream in that it could have very well happened. As she died, Johnson describes how the house slowly burned starting from the magazine. As the fire became overwhelming the glass shattered. The consequences of the fire seem very real. The effect of this experience is overwhelming because it takes on such realistic characteristics, even though he was not there to see it. Yet compared to the China man that he swore, had put a curse on him, the reality of the situation borderlines fantastical when he swore he saw him in the distance when he was walking home.
Note:

               Interesting relationship between Train Dreams the title and literal train dreams. Dream dictionary says that dreams associated with trains usually relate to the feeling that someone else is controlling your life. This can be related to Robert's life in that he lives a full life, with each even taking him to another event.

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Andrea Zittel's "A-Z Six Month Personal" in Comparison to Focault's Docile Bodies



Andrea Zittel’s A-Z Six-Month Personal Uniform is a conceptual gimmick that challenges society’s expectation. While working in the Pat Hearn Gallery, she was faced with the constant expectation of having to dress chic and fashionable. Although the expectations were high, her salary was not as high. She began to knit her own uniforms to wear to work. This became known as the A-Z Six Month Personal Uniform. The styles were mostly practical and accommodated the cold and the warmer weathers. Eventually she began to step out of her comfort zone and began to design clothes with certain ideas in mind. Her phase with wearing rectangular clothing formed the next project “A-Z Rough Uniforms.”
 
“Sometimes if you can’t change the situation, you just have to change the way you think about the solution.”

Her project, “A-Z Six Month Personal Uniform” fits perfectly under the definition of this aphorism. When one cannot change his situation, he can, instead, think positively about the solution and the situation itself will also change, too. In A-Z Six Month Personal Uniform, Andrea Zittel changed her solution, which placed the entire situation in a brighter light. Instead of doing what most people would have done, which is to shop for nice clothing, Zittel designed her own attire. This solution in fact made the entire situation whimsical. Zittel created her own uniforms, which allowed her to save money on her part, as well as design whatever she wanted. I believe in the very moment she decided to rebel against society, she in a sense, won the rights to this aphorism
 
I feel as if there is a direct proportional correlation between Andrea Zittel’s action in creating the uniforms and Docile Bodies. In the sense that Zittel is the prime example of an individual. She created her own designs for clothing because she did not want to spend money on new clothing all the time to look chic and fashionable just like all the other Gallery employees. Instead of fixing the situation at hand with the ideal solution, Zittel decides to make her own clothing. Focault speaks about how the mass creates individuals in Docile Bodies, Zittel becomes this example through her work. She breaks out of society’s norms and creates a gimmick that makes her an individual, thus proving Focault that the only individuals are created from the masses. Society has existed beforehand and have set the standards, but to be an individual, one must break this set of discourse. Zittel breaks the discourse by thinking differently. Instead of an ideal solution, she chooses her own solution. Her solution sheds light on her individualism, which challenges society and the fashion industries.  

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Exploring "Docile Bodies"

               Focault's arguement in Docile Bodies refer to the basic control of society. In order to maintain control over the larger population. Thus creating a society that is efficient and proficient. This can be done by the Focault's formula for "Docile Bodies," which include The Art of Distribution, Control of Activity, Organization of Genesis, and Composition of Forces. Such formula composes the discourse in which we live in now. Focault's definition of discourse is something similar to the codes that shapes the characters in our society. Such that the general public exists in the discourse of the "Docile Bodies."

               Under the Art of Distribution, individuals are enclosed and or partitioned away from others. Through the act of enclosure and partitioning, it "diffuses the circulation," which in turn, prevents individuals from joining together in mass groups. This form of discipline requires the use of architecture. In that the design of one space will proportionately affect the discourse of bodies because enclosures and partitions are created by walls, furniture, etc. Through management of design, individuals can be easily separated as architecture dictates where one belongs.

               In the passage pertaining to the Control of Activity, Focualt mentions that by following a regimented schedule, individuals fall in place. They become automatic machines that follow one "temporal elaboration" of the act. In doing so, they must also follow the same gesture to achieve this form of discipline. Similar to the military troops and their strict training schedules, students also have a set regimented day, in which they all say their prayers. Another form of activity would be the actual tempo of each gesture. Such that all troops will march with their right foot forward in a single pace that mirrors one another and all students will pick up their pencil with their right hands. Using regimented forms of exercise provides another form of control.

               Through the Organization of Genesis, the general public will all fall into one form of control. Because of great attention to little detail and thorough organization, control over the masses can quickly be accomplished in the sense that there is no room for imperfections. This can be proved by the strict schedules and strict routines the troops must follow. Strict schedules set become the discipline. Soldiers act accordingly because such an establishment is known for it.

               The Composition of Forces talks about the composition of groups. Such that each group is categorized for maximum efficiency. This would mean each group is chosen for the abilities that they can contribute to society, yet this categorization will also affect their state of mind, which will promote an efficient mind and body. In the period of Industrialization, most work forces were composed of older citizens and young children. This was because both did not cost a lot to hire because they were unskilled. Since the simple tasks in the factories did not require a skilled worker, an unskilled worker would do just fine. In this composition of forces, the discourse was formed by the necessity for  efficiency and for maximum profit. Discipline forms control over individuals.  

               With this said, there is a direct correlation between architecture and the discipline of space. In which, the design of one place can have  significant impact in the placement of bodies in space. Through the act of design, one can grant access by creating circulation or discipline through acts of enclosure. There is no rule in how architecture can redesign a space and create new discipline, but it is definite in that through details, one can create a new space that manipulates and controls the bodies of others. 

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Focault's Docile Bodies and Architectural Related Studies at Pratt


The space I chose is one of the freshmen dormitories on Pratt’s Campus. The Cannoneer court is designed in the most efficient way possible. In that there are two sides to the dorm, one mainly for the girl population and the other for the male. Both sides have access to the other side through the main lounge, workroom, and the lobby. Upon entering the Cann (as we call it) one will turn left, turn right, or walk up the stairs to the next level. In this journal entry, we will be focusing on the second floor of the Cann, particularly the girl’s side of the hall and the spaces that intersect the hall. With 22 rooms down one hall, there are approximately 44 girls living on one side of the second floor. These girls all share one bathroom at the end of the hall and a workroom along with a main lounge with the whole building.
Through the spatial organization, one can infer that there are only two directions to go to. One is to the communal restroom and the workroom, while the other is to the lounge and exit. Through this organization, there is no other space for the residents to wander off too. The narrow path down the hall suggests that it is not a place for communication. The horizontal pathway only allows two directional movements. If one must communicate in a comfortable manner, it can be done through the workroom or the lounge, which are on either ends of the hall. In this hall, there are many rooms. Each room is spaced approximately five to ten feet away from each other and is accessible only through the doors in the hallway. The placement of each door not only allows for each person to have equal amounts of space within the vicinity of the room, but it also exacts control over the residence. This idea is similar to Focault’s theory on how repetition and partitioning will break down collective dispositions and create useful space, as well as create equal standing among all. No one person has power over another. The shared lounge space and workspace are to encourage communication between those that live in the same building. Although communal restrooms are an inconvenience, it promotes communication because of the forced interaction with your neighbors. This enables freshmen students to create strong bonds with those who live in the same floor. With so many students living in the same hall, security is definitely a concern. Each door is equipped with its own lock system. Similar to Focault’s discussion about Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, the lock system, even if it is not actually in use, act as a barrier between the shared space and personal space. It provides legible boundaries, in the sense that not one person will enter another’s room, even if they know that no one is occupying the room at the moment.  There is a blind trust between those who live in the same place and share the same space. Residential advisors live on either end of the halls. This employs the idea of ranks to keep the population in control when needed.


Sunday, February 9, 2014

Docile Bodies - In Relation to “Spatial Stories”

Questions:

Through the reinvention of one space, there is a distinct social dynamic that it recreates, in the sense that each “place” now manipulates the “space.” If such dynamics can be recreated numerous of times in different institutions (in the military, in school, etc.) how can this be manipulated in relation to different environments? (Especially in an environment where distinct rules have been previously set.)


In the process of the manipulation of society, how is order defined? In the way that society has social levels, what makes one person greater than the other and how does his status guarantee his ability to change the order of “space” to a more definitive “place"?